+  oZone3D.Net Forums
|-+  Our Softwares» Benchmarking» [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
Username:
Password:
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
  Print  
Author Topic: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024  (Read 25815 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mareczq
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: October 07, 2007, 10:01:31 PM »

OC: 730/1890/1117
Logged
EfterlysT
Associate

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: October 08, 2007, 12:21:28 PM »


Logged
liegs
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: October 09, 2007, 01:47:25 PM »

Hey,

I was just wondering, and maybe it's because most results are done on 1.0.0 where I downloaded the version 1.1 or 1.0.1 (I don't remember),
but I can't get this to run without MSAAx4 or whatever, even when I click none which it loads that way, or above it such as 16 or 8,when I click benchmark it still reads MSAA = x4 or whatever, so it's like something it forcing it to do 4x, which I don't believe i've ever had a program to do so, even at different resolutions..

Any Idea please?
Logged
fasterklander
Associate

Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: October 09, 2007, 05:51:24 PM »

CPU & GPU Air Cooled:



Logged
Mareczq
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: October 09, 2007, 11:53:21 PM »

liegs check yours drivers settings;) Maby you got AAx4 set in Nvidia Panel"Smiley

From my expirance, i sow that only shaders clock  give me grater scores;) With 700/1890/1000 i got exalcy the same score (2425)Smiley (the same is with CPU, C2D 2.4 gives the same score as C2D 3.0 ghz)

And interesting is  8800 GTS oc, the shadres can run higher clocks than GTX/Ultra (~1900)
« Last Edit: October 10, 2007, 12:00:51 AM by Mareczq » Logged
liegs
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: October 10, 2007, 03:06:54 AM »

That's what I thought, but I checked and there's nothing.   I didn't add it, and it wasn't there to begin with Sad
Logged
EfterlysT
Associate

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: October 13, 2007, 01:46:18 PM »

3253
Logged
JeGX
Global Moderator
Capo Bastone
*****
Posts: 1850



View Profile WWW
« Reply #67 on: October 21, 2007, 05:35:55 PM »

Comparative table updated!

EfterlysT >  what are the changes you made to get that score ?
Logged

johnspack
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: October 24, 2007, 09:13:32 PM »

Little 7950GT on a Brisbane...

Logged
johnspack
Associate

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: October 25, 2007, 02:48:49 AM »

A little bios vmod, more to come!



Logged
JeGX
Global Moderator
Capo Bastone
*****
Posts: 1850



View Profile WWW
« Reply #70 on: October 25, 2007, 08:29:48 AM »

thanks johnspack, table updated  Wink
Logged

fasterklander
Associate

Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: October 26, 2007, 09:44:54 AM »

Update score Tongue

3429



Logged
JeGX
Global Moderator
Capo Bastone
*****
Posts: 1850



View Profile WWW
« Reply #72 on: October 26, 2007, 05:36:08 PM »

... and table updated  transpi
Logged

vhco
Associate

Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: October 26, 2007, 07:43:19 PM »

... and table updated  transpi

Why don't you include my score 'cause I have the best score?Huh???
Logged
JeGX
Global Moderator
Capo Bastone
*****
Posts: 1850



View Profile WWW
« Reply #74 on: October 27, 2007, 12:01:30 AM »

Sorry vhco, I didn't see it  oops
Fixed. You have a SLI system I suppose ?
Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
  Print  
 
Jump to: