Author Topic: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024  (Read 114027 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Stefan

  • Consigliere
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #135 on: June 27, 2008, 04:13:17 PM »
edit: found the answer to my mini driver question myself (atiumdag=Vista, ati2mtag=XP)

btw:
"PC Home" has a download mirror & description in japanese   ;D
« Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 10:28:24 AM by Stefan »
Systeminfo: CPU-Z - GPU-Z - GPUCapsViewer

fellix

  • Thug
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #136 on: July 09, 2008, 06:26:00 PM »

IcemanX

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #137 on: July 11, 2008, 06:37:36 PM »
Interesting score for a single card...



The memory was slightly OC-ed at 1040, from the default 900
« Last Edit: August 03, 2008, 06:28:24 PM by IcemanX »

zseb

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 86
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #138 on: July 25, 2008, 09:17:53 AM »
voila jegx,
en faite je t ai dis une betise j ai pas le sli ^^ je comprenais pas pourquoi j avais pas cette option dans le panneau nvidia.
ceci dit j ai quand meme fait le test.

stanhemi

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #139 on: July 25, 2008, 05:16:45 PM »
« Last Edit: July 25, 2008, 05:42:04 PM by stanhemi »

shadowblast101

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #140 on: July 28, 2008, 02:12:22 AM »
hd4850 oc'd at 690 and 1100. fan at 85% runs HOT at 90ish Celsius.

Aresez

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #141 on: August 01, 2008, 08:50:14 PM »
4870 lightly overclocked because i don't know if my OCZ 600 watt StealthxStream can take it


ya for 129 gb/s of bandwidth
« Last Edit: August 01, 2008, 08:57:51 PM by Aresez »

stanhemi

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #142 on: August 05, 2008, 02:43:27 AM »
E7200@3600mhz NOT 3800mhz bug!!!
gpu run at 75 celcius max load fan at 80%


« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:09:53 AM by stanhemi »

ruiying

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #143 on: August 05, 2008, 11:06:53 AM »

AlenBMW

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #144 on: August 24, 2008, 08:31:03 PM »
Without overclocking, i just bought the graphic card, and i tested it AS IS.

Tears

  • Associate
  • Posts: 4
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #145 on: August 26, 2008, 01:22:20 PM »
1280 x 1024 - 5876 o3Marks
« Last Edit: August 28, 2008, 06:14:50 PM by Tears »

felynx

  • Thug
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #146 on: August 28, 2008, 12:42:26 PM »

Konceptz

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #147 on: September 02, 2008, 12:45:26 AM »
ATI 4870 OC @ 790/1100




E6600@3.2 | 2GB PC8500 | Samsung Spinpoint F1
« Last Edit: September 02, 2008, 12:53:35 AM by Konceptz »

4var1

  • Guest
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #148 on: September 03, 2008, 07:18:56 PM »
4870x2 O/c @ 860/975 using an EK waterblock.

Before I put the waterblock on - there's no way I'd leave furmark running for any length of time. My vregs used to hit 125 deg c - don't care what ati says - that's just too hot imho! :)


Ropey

  • Associate
  • Posts: 3
Re: [OpenGL Benchmark] Fur Rendering - 1280x1024
« Reply #149 on: October 12, 2008, 04:10:24 AM »