Furmark is still completely fuller bow. Have 9700 points with my GTX295 reached just once.
Then have her against my old HD4870 512 MB exchanged and I have fetched 12354 points there.
A proof that the tool is completely unsuitable for benchmarks. My GTX295 comes onto 38 fps, the HD4870 comes onto 14 fps (1680 x1050, 4xMSAA 16:1 AF in Crysis).
Furmarks multi-GPU works only a 1 GPU isn't always shown either even if in the Nvidia-Control-Display Physic is switched off and Multi-GPU is activated.
A German computer magazine had to do a GTX280 with dry ice once, cooled -35 degrees. In 3DMark06 the card came the card came onto 41281 points, Furmark 1.6.. on 21547 points. Also with liquid nitrogen (in the laboratory) the points were rock gene on 4500 points just once. No test with Furmark reached the limit of 30000 points.
P.S. Old Watermark are Furmark as a test program completely unsuitably, there gives that 3.0 realistic results.
