Author Topic: Furmark 1.70  (Read 2013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bugmenot

  • Associate
  • Posts: 3
Furmark 1.70
« on: November 07, 2009, 05:58:45 AM »
Have only my Gainward GTX295 against a SAPPHIRE Radeon HD4870X2 (of the friend) exchanged, the rest of the hardware and software wasn't changed.

Gainward GTX295:     08564  ???
SAPPHIRE HD4870X2: 16845  ???

Either the program tells more fully bow or is worth not even the dirt under worthy of the fingernails. And still my 8564 points (with Gainward) would a little correspond to 13125 in 3D marks Van day. This is said MOSTROMED would have 951410 points in 3D marks Van day, and that is very improbable. In the second test with my Gainward GTX295 (attitude: 1920 x1200, I had MSAA 16 x) 64 points just once.

Program is  :thumbdown:  :gratgrat:  :RED:

DavyBoy

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Re: Furmark 1.70
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2009, 07:25:11 PM »
I started using Furmark just recently, and I thought that my score was extremely poor when comparing it to other people with the same GPU as me.

I've made a thread of my own in this section, to see if anyone can explain why my scores are extremely low, when there are people who have submitted scores that are MUCH higher than mine, yet they are using the same benchmark settings as me.

There isn't anything wrong with my system, as I am able to run all the latest games with everything maxxed out at 1680x1050 without any issues whatsoever, and my 3d Mark scores are in line with other people who have similar specced machines as me also.

The guys that have posted these uber high Furmark scores that are using the same GPU as me (GTX280) have got slower processors than I have, yet their scores are like 12 times higher than what I am scoring!!

There's definitely something not quite right here tbh, I'm just glad that it's not only me that thinks so!