Author Topic: Are the people on the top 400 list cheating?  (Read 2742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cliffro

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Are the people on the top 400 list cheating?
« on: August 06, 2009, 02:57:08 AM »
My Results:
Quote
Score details for ID = d03397f86807357935df54fd4581eeb3


# Score: 3877 o3Marks
# Submitted by Cliffro @ August 6 2009, 2:18 am

# App Version: oZone3D.Net_FurMark_v1.7.0_Build_Jul 3 2009_at_09:19:42

# Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
# Number of Active GPUs: 1
# GPU Clock: 675 MHz
# Memory Clock: 1151 MHz
# Shader Clock: 0 MHz
# Graphics Drivers: 8.15.11.9038 7-14-2009
# GPU Temperatures (start/end):51°C / 66°C

# Bench Duration: 60 sec.
# Resolution: 1280 x 1024
# MSAA samples: 0
# Window Mode: fullscreen

# CPU: IntelR XeonR CPU E3110 @ 3.00GHz
# CPU Speed: 3402 MHz
# Operating System: Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6001 Service Pack 1

Top Score's Results
Quote

Score details for ID = 749d149f37a917f78639de2e29368a54


    * Score: 88736 o3Marks
    * Submitted by czarek @ July 15 2009, 8:31 pm

    * App Version: oZone3D.Net_FurMark_v1.7.0_Build_Jul 3 2009_at_09:19:42

    * Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
    * Number of Active GPUs: 1
    * Graphics Drivers: 8.15.11.8618 6-10-2009
    * GPU Temperatures (start/end):40°C / 49°C

    * Bench Duration: 60 sec.
    * Resolution: 1280 x 1024
    * MSAA samples: 0
    * Window Mode: fullscreen

    * CPU: IntelR CoreTM2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz
    * CPU Speed: 2666 MHz
    * Operating System: Windows Server 2007 ver.6.1 build 7264 No Service Pack

Seriously? A 9600GT scores higher than a GTX 295/ Core I7 920 @ 4ghz?

Quote
Score details for ID = 4c7d23c5df96bf7dc7fb669192277881


    * Score: 16031 o3Marks
    * Submitted by Anonymous @ March 2 2009, 7:40 am

    * App Version: oZone3D.Net_FurMark_v1.6.5_Build_Feb 3 2009_at_09:10:34

    * Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
    * Number of Active GPUs: 1
    * Graphics Drivers: 7.15.11.8206 2-9-2009
    * GPU Temperatures (start/end):43°C / 60°C

    * Bench Duration: 60 sec.
    * Resolution: 1280 x 1024
    * MSAA samples: 0
    * Window Mode: fullscreen

    * CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
    * CPU Speed: 4000 MHz
    * Operating System: Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6001 Service Pack 1


JeGX

  • Global Moderator
  • Capo Crimine
  • *****
  • Posts: 2357
    • oZone3D.Net
Re: Are the people on the top 400 list cheating?
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2009, 04:15:20 PM »
Yes cliffro, the top ranked positions are wrong scores. Time to time I clean up cheaters (I will do it after the post).
That's why I published on FurMark's homepage a comparative table with average score by type of card:
http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/#comptable

You with a GTX 260, you should have a score around 3300. You have 3877 and it's ok.


cliffro

  • Associate
  • Posts: 2
Re: Are the people on the top 400 list cheating?
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2009, 01:05:43 AM »
Right, It and my CPU are both Overclocked.(my speeds are shown in my score)

TheWolf

  • Associate
  • Posts: 1
Re: Are the people on the top 400 list cheating?
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2009, 11:50:46 PM »
The problem is... if you set the time above the 60 second test you get higher scores.
A bug in the software?, it should be locked to 60 sec. only, then no one could place false scores.
I my self had no idea when adding more time while running the bench this is what would happen.
I did it as a test since I saw that most scores that are summited are unbelievable & in fact cheats as well...
That's If you want to call a flaw in the program a cheat that is. I think the whole page should be whipped,
fix it were the time is locked & start fresh with all new scores.